Even the dogs are barking that the Reserve Bank board is almost certain to cut the official interest rate in two weeks. But those expecting a cut of 50 basis points are barking up the wrong tree.
You have to ask if Reserve governor Glenn Stevens looks like a 50-basis-point kind of guy. Is he the kind of guy who would go for the grand gesture? The kind who’d panic?
Or is he the kind who definitely would not panic; who would keep his cool and act in a quiet, confident, carefully measured way?
He looks like a 25-basis-point kind of guy to me. Speak softly and carry a big stick. And we do know he is the kind who would move the rate by 25 points two months in a row.
What’s more, if the object of the exercise were to make a big impression on consumers and business people — and what central bankers call the “announcement effect” is an important element when you are trying to influence psychology and change behaviour — it’s not at all clear that one 50 beats two 25s in quick succession.
If you have been alive for a while, you know that central banks rarely move rates just once when the time comes to change direction. If 25 points were all you thought you needed to do, you wouldn’t bother.
So we can expect two or three rate cuts before the end of the year. But, at this stage of the game, a total cut of between 0.5 and 1 percentage point is all we should expect.
Remember that, although deputy governor Ric Battellino was right to remind us last week that the Reserve cannot wait for a fall in inflation before it starts cutting rates because it has to act pre-emptively, we still have an inflation problem and downward pressure on inflation needs to be maintained.
In other words, while the sharpness of the slowdown in demand this year has been enough to induce the Reserve to ease tightness, it will want policy to remain reasonably tight until the evidence that the inflation rate is moving into the target zone is clearer.
Of course, implicit in this approach is the Reserve’s judgement that the economy is far from falling in a heap. Should demand continue slowing sharply, that would be a different matter.
Moving to the next big question — will the banks pass on all the cut in the official rate? — Battellino was also right in reminding us that what the Reserve ultimately cares about is the level of the banks’ lending rates, not the level of its official rate.
This is a no-brainer. It is the interest rates actually paid by businesses and households that affect demand. The official rate’s only role is to affect banks’ lending rates.
This reminder could be seen as letting the banks off the hook. Feel free to keep fattening your interest margin, chaps, we’ll accommodate you by making further cuts in our official rate as required.
But the banks would be unwise to see this as a green light. The Reserve would not feel comfortable facilitating uncompetitive behaviour on the part of the banks.
The Reserve keeps a close eye on bank margins. When the global credit crisis forced up the banks’ borrowing costs, and they first began making their “unofficial” increases in mortgage rates, Stevens was willing to defend them against public criticism.
But the Reserve will offer no support this time — as was clear from the observation last week of an assistant governor, Philip Lowe, that there was “no obvious reason” for the banks not to pass on a cut in the official rate.
So, should the banks fail to pass the rate cuts through in full, they can expect no sympathy. They will be roundly condemned by both sides of politics, the media and every talkback jock in the business.
The banks and their chiefs are certainly greedy enough and heedless of customers’ interests, but I doubt those at the top are that stupid.
Posted by sklinky

